Problem statement Assessing kata performance in karate competitions, especially in the World Union of Karate-Do Federations (WUKF), is influenced by the subjective interpretation of criteria such as "strength," "speed," "rhythm," and "kime." This subjectivity can lead to scoring inconsistencies and disputes among referees, coaches, and athletes. Approach To address this issue, a qualitative study was performed involving 40 WUKF karate coaches, instructors, and referees. The study used questionnaires to gather insights into their perspectives on the current judging criteria, their understanding and application of these criteria, and potential areas for improvement. Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the consistency of referee perceptions regarding kata evaluation criteria and to explore ways to enhance objectivity and reduce subjectivity in kata competitions. Results The findings indicate a lack of standardized interpretation of WUKF judging criteria, particularly for concepts such as "control of energy," "understanding the movement of kata," and "spirit." While most respondents expressed satisfaction with the current scoring system, a considerable number also advocated for refinements to improve objectivity. The study also revealed diverse opinions on the potential implementation of video review in kata competitions and the feasibility of ranking katas based on their difficulty. Conclusions The study concludes that although the current WUKF judging system is generally well-received, there is a clear need in the karate community for greater clarity and objectivity in kata evaluation. The findings suggest several potential areas for improvement, including the development of more precise criteria definitions, the incorporation of objective measures where feasible, and the strategic use of technology to assist referees in their evaluations. This research adds to the ongoing discussion on refining judging practices in karate kata competitions, aiming to balance tradition with the pursuit of fairness and objectivity.
© Copyright 2024 Journal of Physical Education and Sport. University of Pitesti. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.