Differences in cricket fast bowling kinematics between grass and artificial surface pitches

(Unterschiede in der Kinematik des Cricket-Fast-Bowlings zwischen Rasen- und Kunstrasenplätzen)

Cricket fast bowling training and research are often conducted on artificial turf, while matches are played on natural grass. It is unknown if technique differs between the different surfaces; therefore, the aim of this study was to explore if fast bowling technique differed between surfaces. Shoe slip distance and kinematic and temporal parameters previously associated with ball release velocity and lumbar bone stress injury were determined for eight male sub-elite fast bowlers using three-dimensional motion analysis on grass and artificial surfaces. Paired t-test and statistical parametric mapping were used to identify differences in technique between surfaces. Significantly greater slip distance was observed during back and front foot contact on the artificial surface compared to bowling on the grass surface. No kinematic or temporal parameter significantly differed between surfaces, therefore fast bowling technique is likely similar between grass and artificial surfaces, and previous research utilising artificial surfaces in fast bowling research is likely to be valid.
© Copyright 2025 Sports Biomechanics. Routledge. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Spielsportarten
Tagging:Kinematik Kunstrasen Rasen
Veröffentlicht in:Sports Biomechanics
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2024.2394804
Jahrgang:24
Heft:7
Seiten:2042-2055
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch