4061037

To Nordic or not to Nordic? A different perspective with reason to appreciate Semitendinosus more than ever

(Mit oder ohne Nordic? Eine andere Perspektive mit Gründen, den Semitendinosus mehr denn ja wertzuschätzen)

Vegemite or marmite, Messi or Ronaldo, Real Madrid or Barcelona, Nordics or no Nordics. These contentious debates continue to occur and will continue to occur for many years to come. But why Nordics versus no Nordics? Has thereever been a bigger debate about a single exercise? Has there been an exercise that has caused more arguments on Twitter or within a performance team as to whether they should be performed? The arguments around delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), the high volumes previously suggested and its non-functional nature continue to drive the discussions (1,2). With a recent systematic review (3) demonstrating a 51% reduction in hamstring injuries with the simple addition of the Nordic hamstring curl (NHC), it is hard for many to argue gainst the favourable outcome-based data that NHCs`provide. It further supports previous work that demonstrated the significant reduction in hamstring injury in those adhering to a prescribed large volume NHC program (1).
© Copyright 2020 Sport Performance & Science Reports. Sport Performance & Science Reports. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Biowissenschaften und Sportmedizin Trainingswissenschaft
Veröffentlicht in:Sport Performance & Science Reports
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Online-Zugang:https://sportperfsci.com/to-nordic-or-not-to-nordic-a-different-perspective-with-reason-to-appreciate-semitendinosus-more-than-ever/
Heft:90
Seiten:1-4
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch