Investigation of validity evidence for the Coach Precompetitive Communication Questionnaire-Preference for measurement of collegiate athlete preferences of coach speech content and delivery

(Untersuchung der Validitätsnachweise für den Fragebogen zur Kommunikation von Trainern vor Wettkämpfen - Präferenz zur Messung der Präferenzen von College-Sportlern hinsichtlich des Inhalts und der Art der Kommunikation von Trainern)

Introduction: Previous measures of athlete perception of pregame speech have centered around a two-dimensional structure of speech content (i.e., tactical and emotional), although psychometric evidence is limited. The Coach Precompetitive Communication Questionnaire - Preference (CPCQ-P) was developed to extend the two-dimensional model of pregame speech content by (a) including speech delivery and (b) allowing a general pregame speech factor. The purpose of this study was to investigate initial validity evidence for responses to the CPCQ-P under an exploratory bifactor approach at the athlete level. Methods: Participants were athletes (N = 264) at level-1 nested within NCAA varsity level teams (G = 36) at level-2. Participant survey responses were analyzed using an exploratory bifactor analysis with a general factor (i.e., pregame speech) and three grouping factors (i.e., tactical content, emotional content, delivery). Results: A four-factor model with three grouping factors and a general factor exhibited approximate to close fit to the data. Review of factor loadings provided initial evidence of validity for the internal structure of responses to the CPCQ-P. Discussion: This study expands the existing psychometric understanding of pregame speech within the collegiate sport context.
© Copyright 2025 Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. Frontiers Media. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften
Tagging:Kommunikation Trainer-Sportler-Beziehung Validität
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1615784
Jahrgang:7
Seiten:1615784
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch