Who chokes under pressure? The Big Five personality traits and decision-making under pressure

(Wer verkrampft in Drucksituationen? Die Big Five Persönlichkeitszüge und Entscheidungsverhalten in Drucksituationen)

Highlights •We test the effect of personality on decision-making under pressure. •Pressure manipulations involved social and combined social and time pressure. •Neuroticism was associated with impaired decision-making under pressure. •Agreeableness also negatively predicted decision-making performance. •Personality can predict who chokes under pressure during decision-making. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether the Big Five personality factors could predict who thrives or chokes under pressure during decision-making. The effects of the Big Five personality factors on decision-making ability and performance under social (Experiment 1) and combined social and time pressure (Experiment 2) were examined using the Big Five Personality Inventory and a dynamic decision-making task that required participants to learn an optimal strategy. In Experiment 1, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed an interaction between neuroticism and pressure condition. Neuroticism negatively predicted performance under social pressure, but did not affect decision-making under low pressure. Additionally, the negative effect of neuroticism under pressure was replicated using a combined social and time pressure manipulation in Experiment 2. These results support distraction theory whereby pressure taxes highly neurotic individuals` cognitive resources, leading to sub-optimal performance. Agreeableness also negatively predicted performance in both experiments. Volltext unter: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267454812_Who_chokes_under_pressure_The_Big_Five_personality_traits_and_decision-making_under_pressure
© Copyright 2015 Personality and Individual Differences. Elsevier. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften Trainingswissenschaft
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and Individual Differences
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Online-Zugang:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.009
Jahrgang:74
Seiten:22-28
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch