This theoretical and empirical research examines the mechanism of comparison within the framework of self-efficacy in junior athletes` sporting activities. The study included junior athletes of varying levels of qualification, participants in international, European, World, and Olympic sports competitions, aged 15 to 19 years. The sample parameters were as follows: n = 114; M = 17.91 years; SD = ±3.43; Me = 18.00. Methods: Valid methods widely used in sports psychology were employed to measure dependent variables such as comparison of capacities (CC) and comparison of opinions (CO), as well as independent variables including motivation for achieving success (MAS), motivation for avoiding failure (MAF), self-efficacy of subject activity (SSA), and self-efficacy of interpersonal communication (SIC). Statistically significant parameters were identified based on the comparison strategy. Results: A correlation matrix and a correlation pleiad of the investigated variables were created. We established seven statistically significant correlations of the parameters of comparison with independent variables (p=.050; p=.010), indicating a regular correlation of the psychological mechanism of comparison with the resultant parameters of educational-training, competitive, and rehabilitative types of junior athletes` sporting activities. It was found that the parameter "comparison of capacities" significantly impacts content subject activity, which can lead to potential dangers. Critical ascending comparison of capacities may depress junior athletes and create false notions that a desirable result is unachievable, as such comparisons directly affect sporting subject activities. Additionally, the parameter "comparison of opinions" is notably dependent, significantly impacting the quality of communication and motivational intentions to win. Discussion and conclusions: It was substantiated that the parameters of comparison of capacities and comparison of thoughts act as psychological mechanisms influencing the resultant parameters of educational-training, competitive, and rehabilitative areas of junior athletes` sporting activities. Comparison can serve as a catalyst for juniors` motivation and self-efficacy. Considering the obtained results in the educational-training process of sports schools for children and youth, junior academies of professional clubs, analytical departments of sports federations, and coaching staffs can enhance the sports psychological literacy of the participants and create a competitive advantage over rivals.
© Copyright 2024 Journal of Physical Education and Sport. University of Pitesti. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.