Comparative anthropometric and physical characteristics of youth football players at the various stages of an international football talent screening and selection program

(Vergleichende anthropometrische und physische Eigenschaften von jungen Fußballspielern in verschiedenen Etappen eines internationalen Talentsichtungs- und Talentauswahlprogramms)

Introduction: This study compares the baseline anthropometric and physical performance characteristics of youth football players at the various levels of a four-stage international humanitarian football talent screening and selection project (Aspire Football Dreams) which aims to inspire hope in children in developing countries. Over the past 9 years, ~4.6 million boys from 19 developing countries across Africa, Asia and Latin America have registered for the project. This study includes data from the first 4 years of the project (2007-2010) as it takes a minimum 4 years to progress to Stage 4. Methods: Players were categorised based on the highest selection stage they achieved; Stage 1 - Country Finals (n=1823), Stage 2 - World Finals (n=49), Stage 3 - Educational and Sports Development Scholarship (n=64), Stage 4 -Professional Contract (n=20). Player progression was decided by a panel of coaches/staff based on a myriad of factors including technical, tactical, physical, psychological measures and predicted future potential. Only a limited number of players progress at any stage and they could opt to drop out at any time. Minimum age to progress to Stage 4 is 18 years old. Three anthropometric (height, seated height and body mass) and three physical performance measures (counter movement jump (CMJ) using a KMS jump mat, 40 m sprint with 10 m splits to assess peak velocity (m/s) using an electronic timing gate system, and a 20 metre multi stage shuttle run test) were assessed on all players during Stage 1. These measures were used for all subsequent analyses. Results: ANOVA analysis showed that players that progressed to Stage 3 were significantly (p 0.05); taller (167.5 vs. 171.1 cm), heavier (55.8 vs. 59.0 kg), faster (40 m sprint - 5.67 vs. 5.43 s), more powerful (CMJ - 37.1 vs. 39.9 cm) and displayed greater endurance (20 m Shuttle score - 11.55 vs. 12.45 level) than those players who did not progress beyond Stage 1. Those players selected to Stage 4 failed to show any significant differences from the other stages which is likely due to the relatively low number of players (n=20) progressing to this stage. Conclusion: These results suggest anthropometric and physical performance characteristics play an important role in the earlier stages of the selection program (Stages 1 to 3). However when it comes to the selection of players for a professional contract at Stage 4, other non-physical measures (i.e., technical skills, tactical understanding, personality, attitude etc.) become equally if not more important.
© Copyright 2016 21st Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Vienna, 6. -9. July 2016. Veröffentlicht von University of Vienna. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Biowissenschaften und Sportmedizin Nachwuchssport Spielsportarten
Veröffentlicht in:21st Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Vienna, 6. -9. July 2016
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Wien University of Vienna 2016
Online-Zugang:http://wp1191596.server-he.de/DATA/CONGRESSES/VIENNA_2016/DOCUMENTS/VIENNA_BoA.pdf
Seiten:213-214
Dokumentenarten:Kongressband, Tagungsbericht
Level:hoch