Mechanical differences between barbell and body optimum power loads in the jump squat exercise
(Mechanische Differenzen zwischen der optimalen Belastung mit einer Hantel und dem Körper bei Sprungkniebeugen)
This study compared the values of bar-peak force (PFBar) and power (PPBar), body-peak force (PFBody) and power (PPBody) and bar-mean propulsive power (MPPBar) in different jump-squat (JS) conditions: unloaded condition (UC); bar-loaded condition (BLC) and optimum bar-MPP condition (OBC). Twenty-five soccer players performed the JS using a bar with negligible mass (UC), using the Smith-machine bar (BLC) and using the load capable of maximizing the bar-MPP (OBC). The PFBody was significantly higher in the UC (2847.9 ± 489.1 N) than in the OBC (2655.4 ± 444.3 N). The UC presented greater PPBody (3775.9 ± 631.5 W) than the BLC (3359.7 ± 664.3 W) and OBC (3357.8 ± 625.3 W). The OBC presented higher values of PFBar, PPBar and MPPBar (676.2 ± 109.4 W) than the BLC (MPPBar = 425.8 ± 53.7 W) (all p < 0.05). In the OBC (compared to the UC), the body peak-power presented a reduction of ˜ 11%, while generating bar-power output from ˜ 59 to 73% higher than the BLC. While the fact that the body-peak power is maximized in the UC denotes a mechanical phenomenon, the bar-optimum load represents an intensity at which both components of the power equation (force and velocity) are optimized. This has important implications for sports training.
© Copyright 2016 Journal of Human Kinetics. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Spielsportarten Trainingswissenschaft Nachwuchssport |
| Tagging: | Kniebeuge |
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Human Kinetics |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2016
|
| Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0044 |
| Jahrgang: | 54 |
| Heft: | 1 |
| Seiten: | 153-162 |
| Dokumentenarten: | Artikel |
| Level: | hoch |