Comparison of two pedaling sensors, I-Crankset and SRM, against a standard reference sensor
(Vergleich von zwei Trittsensoren, I-Crankset und SRM, mit einem Standardreferenzsensor)
Our aim was i) to validate the I-Crankset sensor (I-CS) with a reference torque sensor (RTSL) for the calculation of crankset torque, power and work outputs and ii) to compare I-CS with the SRM sensor, a popular device. SRM and I-CS sensors were mounted simultaneously on a test bench instrumented with the RTSL used to validate I-CS. The protocol included multiple sets of 30 pedaling cycles in three conditions to explore various solicitations. Torque magnitudes, angular velocity and power output were compared using the coefficient of multiple correlation inter-protocol. The results showed a good validity of both the I-CS and SRM for all the conditions in comparison to RTSL for torque`s measurements and power`s calculations, even if an average angular velocity is used by SRM. But this one showed its limitations when calculating the work output.
© Copyright 2015 ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive (Konstanz). Springer. Veröffentlicht von International Society of Biomechanics in Sports. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Ausdauersportarten Naturwissenschaften und Technik |
| Tagging: | Vergleich |
| Veröffentlicht in: | ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive (Konstanz) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Poitiers
International Society of Biomechanics in Sports
2015
|
| Online-Zugang: | https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/6447 |
| Jahrgang: | 33 |
| Heft: | 1 |
| Seiten: | 525-528 |
| Dokumentenarten: | Kongressband, Tagungsbericht |
| Level: | hoch |