The purpose of this study was to compare the times spent at VO2max during an interval training programme and during continuous strenuous runs. Eight long-distance runners took part in three maximal tests on a synthetic track (400 m) whilst breathing through a portable, telemetric metabolic analyser: they comprised firstly, an incremental test which determined vLT, VO2max [59.8 (SD 5.4) ml · min-1 · kg-1], vVO2max [18.5 (SD 1.2) km · h-1], secondly, an interval training protocol consisting of alternately running at 100% and at 50% of vVO2max (30 s each); and thirdly, a continuous high intensity run at vLT + 50% of the difference between vLT and vVO2max [i.e. v<Delta>50: 16.9 (SD 1.00) km · h-1 and 91.3 (SD 1.6)% vVO2max]. The first and third tests were performed in random order and at 2-day intervals. In each case the subjects warmed-up for 15 min at 50% of vVO2max. The results showed that in more than half of the cases the v<Delta>50 run allowed the subjects to reach VO2max, but the time spent specifically at VO2max was much less than that during the alternating low/high intensity exercise protocol [2 min 42 s (SD 3 min 09 s) for v<Delta>50 run vs 7 min 51 s (SD 6 min 38 s) in 19 (SD 5) interval runs]. The blood lactate responses were less pronounced in the interval runs than for the v<Delta>50 runs, but not significantly so [6.8 (SD 2.2) mmol · l-1 vs 7.5 (SD 2.1) mmol · l-1]. These results do not allow us to speculate as to the chronic effects of these two types of training at VO2max.
© Copyright 2000 European Journal of Applied Physiology. Springer. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.