The performance of bicycle transmissions is of interest to the cycling sector for both elite racers and amateur hobbyists. Significant efforts are made by professional teams and individual cyclists to maximise the performance of transmission through equipment choices, gearing selection, and choice of lubrication. Correct selection can improve the physiological efficiency of a rider, increase the power efficiency of a transmission, and better the longevity of components. Transmission performance for cycling applications can be assessed practically by different methods. Literature on various apparatus was reviewed by both Aubert, Roizard, Grappe, and Lallemand (2023), and Barnaby (2023). The most common test equipment are chain dynamometers, where there are two major types: Transmitted Power Measurement (TPM) and Frictional Power Measurement (FPM) dynamometers, also known as Full Load Test and Full Tension Test respectively. The different dynamometer types have associated loading and boundary conditions, resulting in nuanced differences in contact mechanics and lubricant behaviours in the articulating links of chains under test. Consequently, comparing results from different testing methods, and extrapolating the applicability of results to real-world circumstances, is a non-trivial task and there may be significant error associated with oversimplified comparisons of these conditions. In this study, analytical models from Lodge & Burgess (2002) are adapted to illustrate the effect of the different boundary and loading conditions between common dynamometer types used in both academia (Lodge & Burgess, 2002; Spicer et al., 2001) and industry (Friction Facts, 2012; Muc-Off, n.d.). Results are shown in Figure 1. Empirical results from a TPM dynamometer are presented which demonstrate the dependency of cycling specific loading conditions on the test measurand (Figure 2). Sophisticated control of the electric machines with variable frequency drives is exploited to deliver a cyclist`s pedalling torque profile to the driving sprocket of the transmission, and average performance determined over a shaft revolution. Boundary conditions and loading conditions are shown both analytically and empirically to affect the measured performance of a transmission under test where previously conditions have been assumed to be nominally alike. This demonstrates that measured performance is sensitive to the testing conditions and care should be taken in comparing similar, but not identical, test environments as well as extrapolating results to real-world use-cases.
© Copyright 2024 Journal of Science and Cycling. Cycling Research Center. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.