Stationary roller versus velodrome for maximal cycling test: a comparison
(Stationäre Rolle vs. Velodrom als Rad-Maximaltest: ein Vergleich)
The present study aimed to compare the acute cardio-respiratory responses of elite cyclists to a maximal progressive exercise carried out in two different conditions: in a laboratory (using a braked roller) and in an uncovered velodrome. In both testing conditions, ten elite male cyclists (age, 22.3 ± 3.9 years) performed a maximal discontinuous progressive test of 6 minutes per level with 150 W of initial load and increasing 50 W at each level until exhaustion. The heart rate and the ventilation parameters were measured breath-by-breath using a portable metabolic cart gas analysis system with telemetry data transmission. In the first 4 levels of effort, no significant differences were found between the two test conditions regarding VO2, (p=0.193), heart rate (p=0.973) and pedaling cadence (p=0.116). Comparing the maximum values achieved by each athlete in both exercise conditions, significant differences were found for heart rate (p=0.008) and pedaling cadence (p=0.005) but not for VO2max and peak power. Each variable showed a strong correlation between both assessements (VO2, r=0.984, p=0,000; heart rate, r=0.944, p=0.005; pedaling cadence, r=0.900, p=0.014). The amount of variability explained by the linear regression model for both cardio-respiratory parameters also showed a good fit value close to one (VO2max, r2=0.968; heart rate, r2=0.892). Our results suggest that identical cycling protocols conducted in different testing conditions with the same bike leads to equivalent performance but significantly different pedaling cadence and heart rate responses.
© Copyright 2014 Journal of Human Sport & Exercise. University of Alicante. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Ausdauersportarten |
| Tagging: | Trittfrequenz |
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Human Sport & Exercise |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2014
|
| Online-Zugang: | http://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2014.91.02 |
| Jahrgang: | 9 |
| Heft: | 1 |
| Seiten: | 7-16 |
| Dokumentenarten: | Artikel |
| Level: | hoch |