4089866

The "three-point shooting paradox": An artifact or a real phenomenon? Replication with large-scale National Basketball Association (NBA) data

(Das "Drei-Punkte-Wurf-Paradoxon": Ein Artefakt oder ein echtes Phänomen? Replikation mit groß angelegten Daten der National Basketball Association (NBA))

Psychological science is often being criticized for failing to reproduce some of its findings. Considering this critique, Iso-Ahola (2024) argues that it is important to establish a demarcation line between artifact and a real phenomenon, recognizing that psychological phenomena are not constant particles that can be definitively declared to exist or not exist upon discovery. In this brief paper, we utilize newly available large-scale data to replicate a finding by Lidor et al. (2022), who reported a psychological effect wherein professional basketball players shoot better under tight defensive pressure rather than free of it. The current analysis of 781,663 three-point shots over 11 seasons in NBA (as compared to 382 shots taken by 12 players during 12 games in the original study) failed to support the idea of the three-point shooting paradox but instead strongly supports the commonsense hypothesis that tight defense hinders shooting performance.
© Copyright 2024 Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Elsevier. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Spielsportarten
Tagging:NBA
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102759
Jahrgang:76
Seiten:102759
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch