Do field hockey players require a sport-specific biomechanical assessment to classlfy their anterior cruclate ligament injury risk?
The lower limb biomechanics of 13 elite female hockey players were compared between 1) a generic, and 2) a hockey-specific (i.e., flexed trunk and hockey stick present) ACL injury risk movement assessment. Our aim was to determine if an athlete's ACL injury risk classification differed as a function of their movement assessment. An increase in trunk, hip and knee flexion was observed during the hockey-specific movement assessment. No significant differences in key ACL injury risk factors (i.e., peak three dimensional knee moments) were observed. These results show that imposing hockey-specific requirements during a lab based movement assessment did not change an athlete's ACL injury risk classification when compared to a generic movement assessment.
© Copyright 2016 ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive (Konstanz). Springer. Published by International Society of Biomechanics in Sports. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | biological and medical sciences sport games technical and natural sciences |
| Published in: | ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive (Konstanz) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Tsukuba
International Society of Biomechanics in Sports
2016
|
| Online Access: | https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/7051 |
| Volume: | 34 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Pages: | 335-338 |
| Document types: | congress proceedings |
| Level: | advanced |