Do field hockey players require a sport-specific biomechanical assessment to classlfy their anterior cruclate ligament injury risk?

The lower limb biomechanics of 13 elite female hockey players were compared between 1) a generic, and 2) a hockey-specific (i.e., flexed trunk and hockey stick present) ACL injury risk movement assessment. Our aim was to determine if an athlete's ACL injury risk classification differed as a function of their movement assessment. An increase in trunk, hip and knee flexion was observed during the hockey-specific movement assessment. No significant differences in key ACL injury risk factors (i.e., peak three dimensional knee moments) were observed. These results show that imposing hockey-specific requirements during a lab based movement assessment did not change an athlete's ACL injury risk classification when compared to a generic movement assessment.
© Copyright 2016 ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive (Konstanz). Springer. Published by International Society of Biomechanics in Sports. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:biological and medical sciences sport games technical and natural sciences
Published in:ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive (Konstanz)
Language:English
Published: Tsukuba International Society of Biomechanics in Sports 2016
Online Access:https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/7051
Volume:34
Issue:1
Pages:335-338
Document types:congress proceedings
Level:advanced