Selection bias in social facilitation theory? Audience effects on elite biathletes' performance are gender-specific
(Selektionsfehler in der Social Facilitation Theorie? Zuschauereffekte auf die Leistung von Spitzenbiathleten sind geschlechtsspezifisch)
Social facilitation proves robust in conditioning tasks (e.g., running), yet in coordination tasks (e.g., rifle-shooting) some studies report performance deterioration. Recent Biathlon World Cup data offered the unique opportunity to test this task-specificity (conditioning = cross country skiing, coordination = rifle-shooting). Audience restrictions due to COVID-19 allowed to compare athletes' performance in the absence (2020) and presence (season 2018/2019) of an audience. Gender-specific regulations (e.g., course length) necessitated the inclusion of gender as additional factor. Results of 83 (sprint competition) and 34 (mass start competition) biathletes revealed that task-specific social facilitation is moderated by gender: in the presence of an audience male biathletes showed performance improvements in the conditioning task and performance deteriorations in the coordination task; female biathletes showed the reverse pattern. This gender dependency may have gone unnoticed in the past due to sample selection bias (<1/3 female), thereby questioning the generalizability of social facilitation theory.
© Copyright 2021 Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Elsevier. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften Ausdauersportarten |
| Tagging: | Coronavirus |
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology of Sport and Exercise |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
| Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101943 |
| Jahrgang: | 55 |
| Heft: | July |
| Seiten: | 101943 |
| Dokumentenarten: | Artikel |
| Level: | hoch |