Posterolateral elbow impingement in professional boxers

(Posterolaterales Ellbogenimpingement bei Profiboxern)

Background: Elbow injury is common in boxing, but it has not been reported in the literature. The onset is often a hyperextension trauma caused by a missed hit. Clinically the boxers complain of pain, stiffness, and an extension deficit. Purpose: To evaluate the pathogenesis, diagnostic approach, and arthroscopic treatment of elbow injury in boxers, and to compare these with other sports-related elbow injuries. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between 2003 and 2005, a group of 5 professional boxers received a diagnosis of posterior elbow impingement. An arthroscopic debridement was performed. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively with the Hospital for Special Surgery Elbow Assessment Scale. Results: An arthroscopic partial resection of the posterior olecranon tip was performed, and osteophytes and fibrous tissue were removed in this area. Loose bodies were removed from the elbow in 3 patients. They were present in the posterior compartment in 2 patients and the anterior compartment in 1. The Hospital for Special Surgery score showed satisfactory to good improvement after 1 year in all 5 cases. They all showed a normal function at follow-up and had a full return to their sports activities. In contrast with the valgus extension overload syndrome, our patients did not show any signs of concomitant ulnar collateral ligament injury. Conclusion: Posterolateral elbow impingement in boxers is caused by hyperextension trauma. Concomitant medial elbow instability was not present. Standard arthroscopic debridement showed good results.
© Copyright 2008 The American Journal of Sports Medicine. SAGE Publications. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Biowissenschaften und Sportmedizin Kampfsportarten
Veröffentlicht in:The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507308937
Jahrgang:36
Heft:2
Seiten:328-332
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch