Purpose While UEFA soccer pitches have an area per player (APP) of 325m², Small-Sided Games (SSG) are commonly designed with an APP of approximately 150m², thus lacking spatial representativeness. We hypothesize that sub-tasks scaled by a match-derived APP more accurately simulate spatial full-size match conditions compared to prototypical conventional strategies and evaluate this empirically. Methods Positional data was gathered using a crossover, controlled, trial-based methodology with a professional farm team of a German Bundesliga club to quantify spatial representativeness. A total of N = 60 trials contrasted two SSG-based designs (S5vs5 and S7vs7) and two representatively scaled designs (RP5vs5 and RP7vs7) and compared the inter-personal positioning (dyadic distances in attack and defense, Delaunay triangle area) to the spatial conditions of a referential 11vs11. Results Repeated measures ANOVA across the five conditions indicated that while the representative designs resembled full-size condition, the SSG-scaled designs differed significantly from full-sized condition (contrasts full-size 11vs11 against S5vs5; S7vs7: distance to nearest mate in attack and defense, p < .001; distance to nearest opponent, p < .001, and Delaunay Triangle Area in attack and defense, p < .001). Two elements enhanced spatial representativeness: increasing the APP, regardless of format, and involving more players in the format, both led to a closer resemblance to the full-sized 11vs11 condition. Conclusion The data suggest that a match-derived APP allows players to better explore spatial affordances in practice, preparing them for full-size matches. We encourage coaches to design practice formats with a stronger sensitivity to spatial task representativeness.
© Copyright 2025 International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. SAGE Publications. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.