Pivot task increases knee frontal plane loading compared with sidestep and drop-jump

(Eine Drehbewegung erhöht im Vergleich zum Seitwärtsschritt und Niedersprung die frontale Kniebelastung )

The purpose of this study was to assess kinematic and kinetic differences between three tasks (drop-jump, sidestep cutting, and pivot tasks) commonly used to evaluate anterior cruciate ligament risk factors. Nineteen female collegiate soccer athletes from a Division I institution participated in this study. Participants performed a drop-jump task, and two unanticipated tasks, sidestep cutting and pivot. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to assess differences in the kinematic and kinetic parameters between tasks. The pivot task had lower knee flexion (-41.2 ± 8.8°) and a higher valgus angle (-7.6 ± 10.1°) than the sidestep (-53.9 ± 9.4° and -2.9 ± 10.0°, respectively) at maximum vertical ground reaction force. The pivot task (0.8 ± 0.3 multiples of body weight) had higher peak posterior ground reaction force than the drop-jump (0.3 ± 0.06 multiples of body weight) and sidestep cutting (0.3 ± 0.1 multiples of body weight), as well as higher internal varus moments (0.72 ± 0.3 Nm/kgm) than the drop-jump (0.14 ± 0.07 N/m/kgm) and sidestep (0.17 ± 0.5 N m/kgm) at peak stance. During the pivot task, the athletes presented a more erect posture and adopted strategies that may place higher loads on the knee joint and increase the strain on the anterior cruciate ligament.
© Copyright 2011 Journal of Sports Sciences. Taylor & Francis. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Biowissenschaften und Sportmedizin Spielsportarten
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Sports Sciences
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2011
Online-Zugang:http://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.523087
Jahrgang:29
Heft:1
Seiten:83-92
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch