Contrary to the claims of Hoff and Helgerud, the great preponderance of scientific evidence does not support the view, often espoused by exercise physiologists, that fast weight training movements with low repetitions, performed for multiple sets, are necessary to produce optimal increases in muscle strength or power. Contrary to their claim that slow weight training is ineffective in increasing muscle power, and that it may even be detrimental, the research literature shows that such training is at least as effective as the methods espoused by Hoff and Helgerud. Contrary to their claim that training methods that increase muscle mass could be detrimental to soccer performance, we suggest that not only is this claim without foundation, but that strength training methods that fail to produce hypertrophy are unlikely to be optimally effective. We are disappointed that Hoff and Helgerud make such a selective use of the literature in attempting to substantiate their claims, and that they advocate training programmes that are more time-consuming and potentially injurious than necessary. We strongly advise that those interested in increasing their muscle strength and power, to aid their soccer performance, perform a thorough examination of the research literature, and base their training protocols on sound scientific evidence rather than relying on the advice offered by Hoff and Helgerud. It is unfortunate that this paper has reinforced several prominent myths and superstitions in the field of strength training, none of which are actually supported by the scientific evidence but appear to be accepted without question by many exercise physiologists.
© Copyright 2004 www.IARTonline.ca. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.