Evaluation of a field test to assess aerobic endurance and performance in elite caclists
(Evaluation eines Feldtests zur Bewertung der aeroben Ausdauer und der Leistung von Hochleistungsradsportlern)
The assessment of endurance performance is usually conducted during laboratory ergometer tests. In field tests, time to complete a given distance is often the chosen performance measure. Since external conditions can largely influence these measures, the aim was to evaluate the reliability of power output in a field test and validate performance measures obtained from a traditional laboratory ergometer test.
Methods: Fifteen competitive male cyclists (age: 25.6 ± 5.2 y; height: 180.6 ± 4.5 cm; weight: 70.6 ± 4.4 kg; VO2max: 67.1 ± 5.0 ml/min/kg) completed an incremental graded exercise test (GXT) to determine ventilatory threshold, respiratory compensation point (VT, RCP) and lactate turn points (LTP1, LTP2) and two maximal aerobic power 4-min (MAP 4) and 20-min (MAP 20) time-trials, during which power output was measured with mobile power cranks (SRM).
Results: Power (W) was 263 ± 37, 344 ± 38, 243 ± 27, 344 ± 37 and 440 ± 38 W, for LTP1, LTP2, VT, RCP and Pmax, respectively. Average power during the 4-min time-trial (412 ± 53 W) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than during the 20-min time-trial (347 ± 42 W) and was correlated with (r = 0.791 to 0.878, p < 0.001) but significantly different from (p < 0.001) performance markers obtained during GXT. No significant differences were observed between the 20-min time-trial, LTP2 (p = 0.946) and RCP (p = 0.853). Strong test-retest correlations for MAP 4 (ICC = 0.976, p < 0.001) and MAP 20 (ICC = 0.985, p < 0.001) were observed.
Discussion: The test-retest reproducibility was in agreement with the results of a 40-km outdoor time-trial reported by Smith et al. (2001). The reliability of a 3-min laboratory all out test has been published by Burnley et al. (2006) where typical error was found to be ± 7 W or 3 %, which is similar to the results of the 4-min time-trial (± 8 W or 2.2 %). Measures of aerobic performance explained 65 % - 77 % of the variance in MAP 4 and MAP 20. The 4-min time-trial was on average 93 % of Pmax from GXT, reflecting the ability of high-level athletes to tolerate intensities of 95 % - 105 % over 4-15 min. Average power during 20-min time-trial was 79 % of Pmax, which is in accordance with exercise intensities during time-trials in professional cyclists (Lucia, et al., 2001). In conclusion the 4-min and 20-min time-trials are reliable measures of aerobic endurance. The 20-min time-trial is valid to predict RCP and LTP2.
© Copyright 2009 14th annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Oslo/Norway, June 24-27, 2009, Book of Abstracts. Veröffentlicht von The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Ausdauersportarten Trainingswissenschaft |
| Veröffentlicht in: | 14th annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Oslo/Norway, June 24-27, 2009, Book of Abstracts |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oslo
The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
2009
|
| Online-Zugang: | http://www.ecss-congress.eu/OSLO2009/images/stories/Documents/BOAOSLO0610bContent.pdf |
| Seiten: | 542 |
| Dokumentenarten: | Kongressband, Tagungsbericht |
| Level: | hoch |