Discussing conflicting explanatory approaches in flexibility training under consideration of physiology: a narrative review

Key Points Stretching and foam rolling are the most common training interventions when aiming to acutely or chronically increase range of motion. However, it seems questionable to attribute the flexibility increases exclusively to these training routines. The limitations in study methodology are discussed, including different training protocols that result in improved range of motion. This leads to the misinterpretation of the findings based on speculative physiological mechanisms. Acute and chronic stretching are of limited efficacy. Similar range of motion enhancements can be achieved via other training interventions sufficient to enhance body temperature acutely, while chronically, applying mechanical tension to extended muscle lengths seems one important factor, achievable through concurrent alternatives (e.g. resistance training).
© Copyright 2024 Sports Medicine. Springer. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:training science
Published in:Sports Medicine
Language:English
Published: 2024
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02043-y
Volume:54
Issue:7
Pages:1785-1799
Document types:article
Level:advanced