Oxfeldt, M, Marsi, D, Christensen, P. M., Andersen, O. E., Johansen, F. T., Bangshaab, M, Risikesan, J, Jeppesen, J. S., Hellsten, Y, Phillips, S. M., Melin, A. K., Ørtenblad, N & Hansen, M. (2024). Low energy availability followed by optimal energy availability does not benefit performance in trained females. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 56 (5), 902-916. Zugriff am 17.05.2024 unter https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003370
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Oxfeldt, M., Marsi, D., Christensen, P. M., Andersen, O. E., Johansen, F. T., Bangshaab, M., . . . Hansen, M. (2024). Low energy availability followed by optimal energy availability does not benefit performance in trained females. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 56(5), 902-916.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Oxfeldt, M., et al. "Low Energy Availability Followed by Optimal Energy Availability Does Not Benefit Performance in Trained Females." Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 56, no. 5 (2024): 902-916.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Oxfeldt, M., et al. "Low Energy Availability Followed by Optimal Energy Availability Does Not Benefit Performance in Trained Females." Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 56, no. 5, 2024, pp. 902-916.