It is time to abandon single-value oxygen uptake energy equivalents
(Es ist an der Zeit, die einwertigen Energieäquivalente für die Sauerstoffaufnahme aufzugeben)
Physiologists commonly use single-value energy equivalents (e.g., 20.1 kJ/LO2 and 20.9 kJ/LO2) to convert oxygen uptake (Vo2) to energy, but doing so ignores how the substrate oxidation ratio (carbohydrate:fat) changes across aerobic intensities. Using either 20.1 kJ/LO2 or 20.9 kJ/LO2 can incur systematic errors of up to 7%. In most circumstances, the best approach for estimating energy expenditure is to measure both Vo2 and Vco2 and use accurate, species-appropriate stoichiometry. However, there are circumstances when Vco2 measurements may be unreliable. In those circumstances, we recommend that the research report or compare only Vo2.
© Copyright 2023 Journal of Applied Physiology. American Physiological Society. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Trainingswissenschaft Biowissenschaften und Sportmedizin |
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Applied Physiology |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023
|
| Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00353.2022 |
| Jahrgang: | 134 |
| Heft: | 4 |
| Seiten: | 887-890 |
| Dokumentenarten: | Artikel |
| Level: | hoch |