Is active recovery during cold water immersion better than active or passive recovery in thermoneutral water for postrecovery high-intensity sprint interval performance?

High-intensity exercise is impaired by increased esophageal temperature (Tes) above 38 °C and/or decreased muscle temperature. We compared the effects of three 30-min recovery strategies following a first set of three 30-s Wingate tests (set 1), on a similar postrecovery set of Wingate tests (set 2). Recovery conditions were passive recovery in thermoneutral (34 °C) water (Passive-TN) and active recovery (underwater cycling; ~33% maximum power) in thermoneutral (Active-TN) or cold (15 °C) water (Active-C). Tes rose for all conditions by the end of set 1 (~1.0 °C). After recovery, Tes returned to baseline in both Active-C and Passive-TN but remained elevated in Active-TN (p < 0.05). At the end of set 2, Tes was lower in Active-C (37.2 °C) than both Passive-TN (38.1 °C) and Active-TN (38.8 °C) (p < 0.05). From set 1 to 2 mean power did not change with Passive-TN (+0.2%), increased with Active-TN (+2.4%; p < 0.05), and decreased with Active-C (-3.2%; p < 0.05). Heart rate was similar between conditions throughout, except at end-recovery; it was lower in Passive-TN (92 beats/min) than both exercise conditions (Active-TN, 126 beats·min-1; Active-C, 116 beats·min-1) (p < 0.05). Although Active-C significantly reduced Tes, the best postrecovery performance occurred with Active-TN.
© Copyright 2020 Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:training science biological and medical sciences
Tagging:Kaltwasseranwendung
Published in:Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Language:English
Published: 2020
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2019-0189
Volume:45
Issue:3
Pages:251-257
Document types:article
Level:advanced