Banyard, H. G., Tufano, J. J., Delgado, J, Thompson, S. W. & Nosaka, K. (2019). Comparison of the effects of velocity-based training methods and traditional 1RM-percent-based training prescription on acute kinetic and kinematic variables. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 14 (2), 246-255. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0147
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Banyard, H. G., Tufano, J. J., Delgado, J., Thompson, S. W., & Nosaka, K. (2019). Comparison of the effects of velocity-based training methods and traditional 1RM-percent-based training prescription on acute kinetic and kinematic variables. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 14(2), 246-255.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Banyard, H. G., J. J. Tufano, J. Delgado, S. W. Thompson, und K. Nosaka. "Comparison of the Effects of Velocity-based Training Methods and Traditional 1RM-percent-based Training Prescription on Acute Kinetic and Kinematic Variables." International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 14, no. 2 (2019): 246-255.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Banyard, H. G., et al. "Comparison of the Effects of Velocity-based Training Methods and Traditional 1RM-percent-based Training Prescription on Acute Kinetic and Kinematic Variables." International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, vol. 14, no. 2, 2019, pp. 246-255.