DVS Edition Citation

Wahl, P, Zinner, C, Bloch, W & Mester, J. (2012). Passive recovery is superior to active recovery during a high intensity shock microcycle. In R. Meeusen, J. Duchateau, B. Roelands, M. Klass, B. De Geus, S. Baudry & E. Tsolakidis (Hrsg.), 17th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Bruges, 4. -7. July 2012 (, S. 531). Brügge: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Wahl, P., Zinner, C., Bloch, W., & Mester, J. (2012). Passive recovery is superior to active recovery during a high intensity shock microcycle. 17th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Bruges, 4. -7. July 2012, 531.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Wahl, P., C. Zinner, W. Bloch, and J. Mester. "Passive Recovery Is Superior to Active Recovery During a High Intensity Shock Microcycle." 17th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Bruges, 4. -7. July 2012 2012: 531.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Wahl, P., et al. "Passive Recovery Is Superior to Active Recovery During a High Intensity Shock Microcycle." 17th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Bruges, 4. -7. July 2012, 2012, p. 531.