Female athlete triad screening in national collegiate athletic association division I athletes: Is the preparticipation evaluation form effective?

Objective: To evaluate the screening practices and preparticipation evaluation (PPE) forms used to identify college athletes at risk for the female athlete triad (triad). Design: Phone and/or e-mail survey. Setting: National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I universities. Participants: All 347 NCAA Division I universities were invited to participate in a survey, with 257 participating in the survey (74%) and 287 forms collected (83%). Main Outcome Measures: Information about the nature of the PPE was requested from team physicians and certified athletic trainers during a phone or e-mail survey. In addition, a copy of their PPE form was requested to evaluate for inclusion of the 12 items recommended by the Female Athlete Triad Coalition for primary screening for the triad. Results: All 257 universities (100%) required a PPE for incoming athletes; however, only 83 universities (32%) required an annual PPE for returning athletes. Screening was performed on campus at 218 universities (85%). Eleven universities (4%) were using the recently updated fourth edition PPE. Only 25 universities (9%) had 9 or more of the 12 recommended items included in their forms, whereas 127 universities (44%) included 4 or less items. Relevant items that were omitted from more than 40% of forms included losing weight to meet the image requirements of a sport; using vomiting, diuretics, and/or laxatives to lose weight; and the number of menses experienced in the past 12 months. Conclusions: The current PPE forms used by NCAA Division I universities may not effectively screen for the triad.
© Copyright 2012 Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:biological and medical sciences
Tagging:Essstörung
Published in:Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Language:English
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182425aee
Volume:22
Issue:2
Pages:122-125
Document types:article
Level:advanced