Greater adaptations with submaximal muscle lengthening than maximal shortening contractions

It has been known for a long time that the strength demands of eccentric contractions far exceed those of concentric contractions in a coordinated movement. Studies which have used maximal eccentric load versus maximal concentric load have shown superior strength gains for eccentric training. This study controlled for load so that both forms of contraction were overloaded by the same amount. Ss were women. Eccentric contractions were still shown to develop significantly greater strength gains than concentric contractions despite the similarity of loads. Implication: Eccentric strength training, even under submaximal eccentric loads, produces better strength gains than concentric training. This suggests this might be a better form of rehabilitation strength training. However, the specificity of effects further support the contention that strength training is particularly specific and is likely to have little transfer to whole-body sporting activities.
© Copyright 1996 Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:biological and medical sciences training science
Published in:Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Language:English
Published: 1996
Online Access:https://coachsci.sdsu.edu/csa/vol21/hortoba1.htm
Volume:28
Issue:5
Pages:S761
Document types:article
Level:intermediate