Living low-training high: Innovative applications and new perspectives on hypoxic interventions for athletes

The effects of varying degrees of hypoxia on exercise performance have been investigated for many decades (Roskamm et al., Citation1969). In the late twentieth century, living at sea-level but training under hypoxia (which at the time was being referred to as intermittent hypoxic training: IHT) received relatively modest attention in scientific literature. Despite increased attention in the twenty-first century (which by then had been termed live low, train high: LLTH), a review in 2012 concluded that "LLTH does not increase exercise performance at sea level in endurance athletes any more than simply training at sea level" (Lundby et al., Citation2012). A breakthrough occurred in 2013, when Faiss, Léger, et al. (Citation2013) reported improved repeated-sprint performance at sea-level with associated peripheral adaptations following repeated-sprint training in hypoxia (RSH). A review published by the same group that year summarised that, due to "strikingly poor benefits for sea-level performance" following IHT, it was time to turn scientific inquiry towards higher-intensity hypoxic training strategies which are based on "different fundamental mechanisms" (Faiss, Girard, et al., Citation2013). A meta-analysis published only 4 years later vindicated this proposal, demonstrating that RSH induces greater improvement for sea-level repeated sprints than matched training in normoxia (Brocherie et al., Citation2017). This differentiation of LLTH modes with distinct mechanisms and resultant performance outcomes has led to a proliferation of research in this area. The first attempts to outline the scope of the LLTH research area identified passive, continuous, interval and repeated-sprint modes (Millet et al., Citation2013). By 2020, nine distinct LLTH modes had emerged in the literature, including seven systemic hypoxic training strategies and two localised hypoxic strategies involving blood flow restriction (BFR) (Girard et al., Citation2020). Meanwhile, BFR was also a rapidly developing area of athletic performance research, and soon after, nine distinct BFR modes were identified in a review of the area (Scott et al., Citation2023). While that review identified only two established and efficacious methods of BFR training in the literature (low-load resistance exercise and low-intensity aerobic exercise), many of the same mechanisms responsible for higher-intensity training adaptations with systemic hypoxia have theoretical potential via localised hypoxia (Mckee et al., Citation2023).
© Copyright 2025 Journal of Sports Sciences. Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:training science biological and medical sciences
Published in:Journal of Sports Sciences
Language:English
Published: 2025
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2541434
Volume:43
Issue:19
Pages:2101-2104
Document types:article
Level:advanced