Bonafiglia, J. T., Islam, H, Preobrazenski, N & Gurd, B. J. (2022). Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VO2max responses to sprint interval vs. continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 11 (5), 552-566. Zugriff am 22.08.2023 unter https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.03.005
APA (7th ed.) CitationBonafiglia, J. T., Islam, H., Preobrazenski, N., & Gurd, B. J. (2022). Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VO2max responses to sprint interval vs. continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 11(5), 552-566.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationBonafiglia, J. T., H. Islam, N. Preobrazenski, and B. J. Gurd. "Risk of Bias and Reporting Practices in Studies Comparing VO2max Responses to Sprint Interval Vs. Continuous Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Journal of Sport and Health Science 11, no. 5 (2022): 552-566.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationBonafiglia, J. T., et al. "Risk of Bias and Reporting Practices in Studies Comparing VO2max Responses to Sprint Interval Vs. Continuous Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 11, no. 5, 2022, pp. 552-566.