Orange, S. T., Hritz, A, Pearson, L, Jeffries, O, Jones, T. W. & Steele, J. (2022). Comparison of the effects of velocity-based vs. Traditional resistance training methods on adaptations in strength, power, and sprint speed: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and quality of evidence appraisal. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40 (11), 1220-1234. Zugriff am 12.09.2022 unter https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2022.2059320
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Orange, S. T., Hritz, A., Pearson, L., Jeffries, O., Jones, T. W., & Steele, J. (2022). Comparison of the effects of velocity-based vs. Traditional resistance training methods on adaptations in strength, power, and sprint speed: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and quality of evidence appraisal. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(11), 1220-1234.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Orange, S. T., A. Hritz, L. Pearson, O. Jeffries, T. W. Jones, und J. Steele. "Comparison of the Effects of Velocity-based Vs. Traditional Resistance Training Methods on Adaptations in Strength, Power, and Sprint Speed: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Quality of Evidence Appraisal." Journal of Sports Sciences 40, no. 11 (2022): 1220-1234.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Orange, S. T., et al. "Comparison of the Effects of Velocity-based Vs. Traditional Resistance Training Methods on Adaptations in Strength, Power, and Sprint Speed: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Quality of Evidence Appraisal." Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 40, no. 11, 2022, pp. 1220-1234.