Kaufmann, S, Hoos, O, Beck, A, Fueller, F, Latzel, R & Beneke, R. (2021). The metabolic relevance of type of locomotion in anaerobic testing: Bosco continuous jumping test versus wingate anaerobic test of the same duration. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16 (11), 1663-1669. Zugriff am 27.01.2022 unter https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0669
APA (7th ed.) CitationKaufmann, S., Hoos, O., Beck, A., Fueller, F., Latzel, R., & Beneke, R. (2021). The metabolic relevance of type of locomotion in anaerobic testing: Bosco continuous jumping test versus wingate anaerobic test of the same duration. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(11), 1663-1669.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationKaufmann, S., O. Hoos, A. Beck, F. Fueller, R. Latzel, and R. Beneke. "The Metabolic Relevance of Type of Locomotion in Anaerobic Testing: Bosco Continuous Jumping Test Versus Wingate Anaerobic Test of the Same Duration." International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 16, no. 11 (2021): 1663-1669.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationKaufmann, S., et al. "The Metabolic Relevance of Type of Locomotion in Anaerobic Testing: Bosco Continuous Jumping Test Versus Wingate Anaerobic Test of the Same Duration." International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, vol. 16, no. 11, 2021, pp. 1663-1669.