Moghaddam, M, Estrada, C. A., Muddle, T. W., Magrini, M. A., Jenkins, N. D. & Jacobson, B. H. (2021). Similar anaerobic and aerobic adaptations after 2 high-intensity interval training configurations: 10:5 s vs. 20:10 s work-to-rest ratio. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35 (6), 1685-1692. Zugriff am 04.08.2021 unter https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002939
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Moghaddam, M., Estrada, C. A., Muddle, T. W., Magrini, M. A., Jenkins, N. D., & Jacobson, B. H. (2021). Similar anaerobic and aerobic adaptations after 2 high-intensity interval training configurations: 10:5 s vs. 20:10 s work-to-rest ratio. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(6), 1685-1692.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Moghaddam, M., C. A. Estrada, T. W. Muddle, M. A. Magrini, N. D. Jenkins, und B. H. Jacobson. "Similar Anaerobic and Aerobic Adaptations After 2 High-intensity Interval Training Configurations: 10:5 S Vs. 20:10 S Work-to-rest Ratio." The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 35, no. 6 (2021): 1685-1692.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Moghaddam, M., et al. "Similar Anaerobic and Aerobic Adaptations After 2 High-intensity Interval Training Configurations: 10:5 S Vs. 20:10 S Work-to-rest Ratio." The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 35, no. 6, 2021, pp. 1685-1692.