"Live High-Train Low" paradigm: Moving the debate forward

The recent article by Drs. Bejder and Nordsborg (http://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000144) on the weakness of scientific evidences supporting that the hypobaric or normobaric "live high-train low" (LHTL) method improves sport-specific exercise performance has the merit of recalling the importance of careful methodological design for future altitude-related research. Although we agree that double blinding, inclusion of a normoxic control group, implementation of a lead-in period, adequate sample size, and statistical power are paramount to minimize the potential biases (e.g., placebo or nocebo effect, training content or trainability influence), several comments would merit consideration. Response by Bejder and Nordsborg : http://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000165
© Copyright 2018 Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:biological and medical sciences training science endurance sports
Published in:Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
Language:English
Published: Hagerstown Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000164
Volume:46
Issue:4
Pages:271
Document types:article
Level:advanced