Cooke, M. B., Nix, C. M., Greenwood, L. D. & Greenwood, M. C. (2018). No differences between Alter G-Trainer and active and passive recovery strategies on isokinetic strength, systemic oxidative stress and perceived muscle soreness after exercise-induced muscle damage. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 32 (3), 736-747. Zugriff am 06.01.2020 unter https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001750
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Cooke, M. B., Nix, C. M., Greenwood, L. D., & Greenwood, M. C. (2018). No differences between Alter G-Trainer and active and passive recovery strategies on isokinetic strength, systemic oxidative stress and perceived muscle soreness after exercise-induced muscle damage. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 32(3), 736-747.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Cooke, M. B., C. M. Nix, L. D. Greenwood, und M. C. Greenwood. "No Differences Between Alter G-Trainer and Active and Passive Recovery Strategies on Isokinetic Strength, Systemic Oxidative Stress and Perceived Muscle Soreness After Exercise-induced Muscle Damage." The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 32, no. 3 (2018): 736-747.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Cooke, M. B., et al. "No Differences Between Alter G-Trainer and Active and Passive Recovery Strategies on Isokinetic Strength, Systemic Oxidative Stress and Perceived Muscle Soreness After Exercise-induced Muscle Damage." The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 32, no. 3, 2018, pp. 736-747.