Rieger, M. G., Hoiland, R. L., Tremblay, J. C., Stembridge, M, Bain, A. R., Flück, D, Subedi, P, Anholm, J. D. & Ainslie, P. N. (2017). One session of remote ischemic preconditioning does not improve vascular function in acute normobaric and chronic hypobaric hypoxia. Experimental Physiology, 102 (9), 1143-1157. doi: 10.1113/EP086441
APA (7th ed.) CitationRieger, M. G., Hoiland, R. L., Tremblay, J. C., Stembridge, M., Bain, A. R., Flück, D., . . . Ainslie, P. N. (2017). One session of remote ischemic preconditioning does not improve vascular function in acute normobaric and chronic hypobaric hypoxia. Experimental Physiology, 102(9), 1143-1157.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationRieger, M. G., R. L. Hoiland, J. C. Tremblay, M. Stembridge, A. R. Bain, D. Flück, P. Subedi, J. D. Anholm, and P. N. Ainslie. "One Session of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Does Not Improve Vascular Function in Acute Normobaric and Chronic Hypobaric Hypoxia." Experimental Physiology 102, no. 9 (2017): 1143-1157.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationRieger, M. G., et al. "One Session of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Does Not Improve Vascular Function in Acute Normobaric and Chronic Hypobaric Hypoxia." Experimental Physiology, vol. 102, no. 9, 2017, pp. 1143-1157.