DVS Edition Citation

Giessing, J, Eichmann, B, Steele, J & Fisher, J. (2016). A comparison of low volume `high-intensity-training` and high volume traditional resistance training methods on muscular performance, body composition, and subjective assessments of training. Biology of Sport, 33 (3), 241-249. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1201813

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Giessing, J., Eichmann, B., Steele, J., & Fisher, J. (2016). A comparison of low volume `high-intensity-training` and high volume traditional resistance training methods on muscular performance, body composition, and subjective assessments of training. Biology of Sport, 33(3), 241-249.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Giessing, J., B. Eichmann, J. Steele, and J. Fisher. "A Comparison of Low Volume `high-intensity-training` and High Volume Traditional Resistance Training Methods on Muscular Performance, Body Composition, and Subjective Assessments of Training." Biology of Sport 33, no. 3 (2016): 241-249.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Giessing, J., et al. "A Comparison of Low Volume `high-intensity-training` and High Volume Traditional Resistance Training Methods on Muscular Performance, Body Composition, and Subjective Assessments of Training." Biology of Sport, vol. 33, no. 3, 2016, pp. 241-249.