Weakley, J. J., Till, K, Read, D. B., Roe, G. A., Darrall-Jones, J, Phibbs, P. J. & Jones, B. (2017). The effects of traditional, superset, and tri-set resistance training structures on perceived intensity and physiological responses. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 117 (9), 1877-1889. Zugriff am 10.03.2021 unter https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3680-3
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Weakley, J. J., Till, K., Read, D. B., Roe, G. A., Darrall-Jones, J., Phibbs, P. J., & Jones, B. (2017). The effects of traditional, superset, and tri-set resistance training structures on perceived intensity and physiological responses. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 117(9), 1877-1889.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Weakley, J. J., K. Till, D. B. Read, G. A. Roe, J. Darrall-Jones, P. J. Phibbs, und B. Jones. "The Effects of Traditional, Superset, and Tri-set Resistance Training Structures on Perceived Intensity and Physiological Responses." European Journal of Applied Physiology 117, no. 9 (2017): 1877-1889.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Weakley, J. J., et al. "The Effects of Traditional, Superset, and Tri-set Resistance Training Structures on Perceived Intensity and Physiological Responses." European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 117, no. 9, 2017, pp. 1877-1889.