"I am" versus "we are": Effects of distinctive variants of self-talk on efficacy beliefs and motor performance
Before completing a team-based dart-throwing activity, 80 undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of three pre-performance self-talk conditions: (a) self-talk statements that focused upon one's personal capabilities, (b) self-talk statements emphasizing the group's capabilities, or (c) a control condition where neutral statements were implemented. Participants in all conditions subsequently rated their confidence in their own (i.e. self-efficacy) as well as their team's (i.e. collective efficacy) capabilities, before carrying out the task. Overall, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and performance indicators were all greatest for individuals who practised self-talk focusing on the group's capabilities, as opposed to individual-focused and neutral conditions. Findings are considered with respect to their novel theoretical contribution to the social cognition literature and their implications for fostering efficacy perceptions and team performance.
© Copyright 2011 Journal of Sports Sciences. Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | social sciences |
| Published in: | Journal of Sports Sciences |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.593186 |
| Volume: | 29 |
| Issue: | 13 |
| Pages: | 1417-1424 |
| Document types: | article |
| Level: | advanced |