What is the most recommended alternative method to DXA to assess changes in body fat percentage in elite youth soccer players?

(Was ist die am häufigsten empfohlene Alternative zur DXA bei der Bestimmung des Körperfettanteils von Nachwuchsfußballspielern des Hochleistungsbereichs?)

Introduction: Body fat percentage (BF%) has been shown to be an important item for talent identification (Reilly et al., 2000) and injury prevention in elite-standard youth soccer (Kemper et al., 2015). Our aim was to find out what are the most appropriate alternative methods to identify changes in BF% ( BF%) when dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used as the reference method in elite youth soccer players. Methods: The sample was composed of 20 highly-trained youth soccer players (17.1±0.5 y). BF% was measured in the preseason and in the middle of season (5 months after) by DXA [Hologic Serie Discovery QDR, USA], 2 bioelectrical impedance analyzers [Tanita BC- 418 (TA), JP; and InBody770 (IB), KR], and skinfold thickness measurement using a Holtain caliper and estimating BF% through several formulas proposed in the literature [Slaughter (SLA), Faulkner (FAU), Carter (CAR), Durnin-Wormersley (DW), Brook (BR), Withers (WIT), and Lohman (LOH)]. T test for dependent samples, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used. Results: BF% measured by DXA was significantly decreased after 5 months of soccer competition (11.4±2.6% vs. 10.7±2.2%; p<0.05). ICCs between dBF% by DXA and alternative methods were: 0.53 (TA), 0.44 (IB), 0.83 (SLA), 0.70 (FAU), 0.74 (CAR), 0.79 (DW), 0.75 (BR), 0.87 (WIT), and 0.58 (LOH) (all p<0.05). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a significant bias [95%CI] between dBF% by DXA and dBF% by IB (1.9% [5.7, -1.9]), FAU (-0.6% [1.1, -2.3]), CAR (-0.8% [1.0, -2.6]), DW (-0.8% [1.0, -2.6]), BR (-1.1% [1.1, -3.3]), WIT (-0.5% [0.9, -2.0]), and LOH (-0.7% [1.3, -2.7]) (all p<0.01), but not for TA (-0.5% [2.3, -3.2]) and SLA (-0.3% [1.8, -2.4]. The difference between DXA and IB, FAU, CAR, and LOH in estimating dBF% was affected by the amount of dBF% (r²=0.25-0.80; p<0.05). Conclusion: The equation of Slaughter et al., which includes triceps and medial calf skinfold thicknesses, seems to be the most recommended alternative method to DXA to assess dBF% in young soccer players due to its moderate-high ICC and lack of significant bias with DXA.
© Copyright 2016 21st Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Vienna, 6. -9. July 2016. Veröffentlicht von University of Vienna. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Biowissenschaften und Sportmedizin Nachwuchssport Spielsportarten
Veröffentlicht in:21st Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Vienna, 6. -9. July 2016
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Wien University of Vienna 2016
Online-Zugang:http://wp1191596.server-he.de/DATA/CONGRESSES/VIENNA_2016/DOCUMENTS/VIENNA_BoA.pdf
Seiten:45
Dokumentenarten:Kongressband, Tagungsbericht
Level:hoch