The agreement between a wearable inertial sensor (GYKO, G) and the force platform (P) was assessed by evaluating test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled; the selected indices of balance were investigated over foot positions and (un)stable conditions. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM%) and minimal detectable change (MDC95%) were computed. For G, ICC bounds range from poor to excellent (0.040 ÷ 0.921), mean of 0.687 (= moderate reliability). Regarding P, ICC ranges from poor to excellent (0.070 ÷ 0.920), mean of 0.683 (= moderate reliability). For G, SEM% ranges from 11% to 47%; MDC95% from 30% to 132%. Concerning P, SEM% ranges from 7% to 41%; MDC95% from 21% to 114%. Finally, the inter-rater reliability ICC by comparing devices ranges from poor to excellent (-0.162 ÷ 0.911), mean of 0.338 (= poor reliability). GYKO appears to be a convenient tool with high consistency among multiple measurements but for specific clinic/research purposes.
© Copyright 2024 Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.