4049908
Comparison of 2-D and 3-D motion analysis in the calculation of lower-body joint angle - A pilot study
Whilst three-dimensional (3-D) motion analysis is recognised as the `gold standard` for measuring joint kinematics, its implementation requires financial investment and trained staff. In comparison, the validity of two-dimensional (2-D) analysis for measuring joint angles during a countermovement jump (CMJ) is yet to be assessed. The current study aimed to assess the concurrent validity of 2-D motion analysis compared to 3-D motion analysis, in measuring sagittal plane knee flexion and extension during a CMJ.
© Copyright 2017 Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning. Australian Strength and Conditioning Association. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | technical and natural sciences |
| Tagging: | Bewegungsanalyse |
| Published in: | Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: | https://www.strengthandconditioning.org/jasc-25-6 |
| Volume: | 25 |
| Issue: | 6 |
| Pages: | 41 |
| Document types: | article |
| Level: | advanced |