Test-retest reliability and reproducibility of laser- versus contact-displacement sensors in mechanomyography: Implications for musculoskeletal research
Whole muscle mechanomyography (MMG) has gained considerable interest in recent years for its ability to noninvasively determine muscle contractile properties (ie, contraction time [Tc], half-relaxation time [1/2Tr], and maximal displacement [Dmax)]). The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of two fairly novel MMG transducers: a laser-displacement sensor (LDS) and contact-displacement sensor (CDS). MMG was conducted on the rectus femoris muscle of 30 healthy individuals on 4 separate occasions. Test-retest reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Both sensors were reliable for time-derived parameters Tc (ICCs, 0.85-0.88) and 1/2Tr (0.77-0.89), with Dmax identified as the most reproducible parameter (0.89-0.94). The 2 sensors produced similar Tc and Dmax measures, although significant (P < .05) systematic bias was identified with the CDS recording higher mean values, on average. However, these differences may not be considered clinically significant. The wide limits of agreement identified between 1/2Tr measures (-19.0 ms and 25.2 ms) are considered unreliable from a clinical perspective. Overall, MMG demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability for the assessment of muscle contractile properties with no significant differences identified between sessions, thus further validating its applicability as a noninvasive measure of muscle contractile properties. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR
© Copyright 2017 Journal of Applied Biomechanics. Human Kinetics. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | training science technical and natural sciences |
| Tagging: | Laser |
| Published in: | Journal of Applied Biomechanics |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0085 |
| Volume: | 33 |
| Issue: | 2 |
| Pages: | 130-136 |
| Document types: | electronical journal |
| Level: | advanced |