DVS Edition Citation

Baumgart, J. K., Skovereng, K & Sandbakk, O. (2017). Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between closed-end and incremental upper-body poling tests. Frontiers in Physiology, 8 , 857. Zugriff am 08.08.2018 unter https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00857

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Baumgart, J. K., Skovereng, K., & Sandbakk, O. (2017). Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between closed-end and incremental upper-body poling tests. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 857.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Baumgart, J. K., K. Skovereng, and O. Sandbakk. "Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters Between Closed-end and Incremental Upper-body Poling Tests." Frontiers in Physiology 8 (2017): 857.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Baumgart, J. K., et al. "Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters Between Closed-end and Incremental Upper-body Poling Tests." Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 8, 2017, p. 857.