Baumgart, J. K., Skovereng, K & Sandbakk, O. (2017). Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between closed-end and incremental upper-body poling tests. Frontiers in Physiology, 8 , 857. Zugriff am 08.08.2018 unter https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00857
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Baumgart, J. K., Skovereng, K., & Sandbakk, O. (2017). Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between closed-end and incremental upper-body poling tests. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 857.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Baumgart, J. K., K. Skovereng, und O. Sandbakk. "Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters Between Closed-end and Incremental Upper-body Poling Tests." Frontiers in Physiology 8 (2017): 857.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Baumgart, J. K., et al. "Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters Between Closed-end and Incremental Upper-body Poling Tests." Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 8, 2017, p. 857.