DVS Edition Citation

Düking, P, Sperlich, B, Voigt, L, Van Hooren, B., Zanini, M & Zinner, C. (2024). ChatGPT generated training plans for runners are not rated optimal by coaching experts, but increase in quality with additional input information. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 23 (1), 56-72. Zugriff am 20.03.2025 unter https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.56

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Düking, P., Sperlich, B., Voigt, L., Van Hooren, B., Zanini, M., & Zinner, C. (2024). ChatGPT generated training plans for runners are not rated optimal by coaching experts, but increase in quality with additional input information. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 23(1), 56-72.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Düking, P., B. Sperlich, L. Voigt, B. Van Hooren, M. Zanini, and C. Zinner. "ChatGPT Generated Training Plans for Runners Are Not Rated Optimal by Coaching Experts, but Increase in Quality with Additional Input Information." Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 23, no. 1 (2024): 56-72.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Düking, P., et al. "ChatGPT Generated Training Plans for Runners Are Not Rated Optimal by Coaching Experts, but Increase in Quality with Additional Input Information." Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, 2024, pp. 56-72.