Düking, P, Sperlich, B, Voigt, L, Van Hooren, B., Zanini, M & Zinner, C. (2024). ChatGPT generated training plans for runners are not rated optimal by coaching experts, but increase in quality with additional input information. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 23 (1), 56-72. Zugriff am 20.03.2025 unter https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.56
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Düking, P., Sperlich, B., Voigt, L., Van Hooren, B., Zanini, M., & Zinner, C. (2024). ChatGPT generated training plans for runners are not rated optimal by coaching experts, but increase in quality with additional input information. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 23(1), 56-72.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Düking, P., B. Sperlich, L. Voigt, B. Van Hooren, M. Zanini, und C. Zinner. "ChatGPT Generated Training Plans for Runners Are Not Rated Optimal by Coaching Experts, but Increase in Quality with Additional Input Information." Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 23, no. 1 (2024): 56-72.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Düking, P., et al. "ChatGPT Generated Training Plans for Runners Are Not Rated Optimal by Coaching Experts, but Increase in Quality with Additional Input Information." Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, 2024, pp. 56-72.