Kinematic comparison of opencap and IMU with marker-based motion capture in treadmill running: a pilot study
The purpose of this pilot study was to compare lower-limb running kinematics measured using a markerless system, OpenCap, and inertial measurement units (IMUs) against the marker-based motion capture (mocap) system. One participant ran at 2.22 m/s on a treadmill for one minute. Mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of hip, knee, and ankle flexion were calculated independently for all 3 devices. Time synchronization of devices was facilitated by performing a `kick` and identifying its peak knee angle prior to running. Offset correction was also applied to OpenCap and IMUs data to match those of marker-based mocap data at the start of time synchronization. OpenCap exhibited a higher degree of error than IMUs in all joint angles compared to marker-based mocap both before and after an offset correction was applied, with errors exceeding 10°.
© Copyright 2024 ISBS Proceedings Archive: Vol. 42: Iss. 1. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | technical and natural sciences |
| Published in: | ISBS Proceedings Archive: Vol. 42: Iss. 1 |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol42/iss1/136/ |
| Volume: | 42 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Pages: | 136 |
| Document types: | article |
| Level: | advanced |