The fallacy of single trials: the need for multiple trials in assessing running economy responses in advanced footwear technology
In the quest to uncover the underlying mechanisms responsible for the performance-enhancing benefits imparted by advanced footwear technology (AFT), footwear researchers are employing an individual-level approach. In doing so, they hope to unveil individual-specific responses to AFT otherwise masked by a group-level approach. Classifying an individual`s response on the basis of running economy (RE) is a logical strategy given that the intended purpose of AFT is to enhance performance; however, caution should be taken when doing so. Metabolic measurement devices are far from perfect, and given the known errors associated with metabolic measurements we would like to reiterate a suggestion first made 40 years ago: when seeking to quantify the interindividual variability of improvement in RE associated with running in AFT, the best practice is to rely on a minimum of two same-day measurements of RE.
© Copyright 2024 Sports Medicine. Springer. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | biological and medical sciences endurance sports technical and natural sciences |
| Published in: | Sports Medicine |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01991-1 |
| Volume: | 54 |
| Issue: | 6 |
| Pages: | 1357-1360 |
| Document types: | article |
| Level: | advanced |