DVS Edition Citation

Thorsson, S, Rayner, D, Palm, G, Lindberg, F, Carlström, E, Börjesson, M, Nilson, F, Khorram-Manesh, A & Holmer, B. (2021). Is Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) a superior screening tool for heat stress risk than Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) index? Eight years of data from the Gothenburg half marathon. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55 (15), 825-830. Zugriff am 12.11.2021 unter http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/55/15/825.abstract

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Thorsson, S., Rayner, D., Palm, G., Lindberg, F., Carlström, E., Börjesson, M., . . . Holmer, B. (2021). Is Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) a superior screening tool for heat stress risk than Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) index? Eight years of data from the Gothenburg half marathon. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(15), 825-830.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Thorsson, S., D. Rayner, G. Palm, F. Lindberg, E. Carlström, M. Börjesson, F. Nilson, A. Khorram-Manesh, and B. Holmer. "Is Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) a Superior Screening Tool for Heat Stress Risk than Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) Index? Eight Years of Data from the Gothenburg Half Marathon." British Journal of Sports Medicine 55, no. 15 (2021): 825-830.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Thorsson, S., et al. "Is Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) a Superior Screening Tool for Heat Stress Risk than Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) Index? Eight Years of Data from the Gothenburg Half Marathon." British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 55, no. 15, 2021, pp. 825-830.